Bad comparison?
by Fletcher Armstrong
Continuing our See you in the funny papers series (explanation), this one from the Grand Valley State University Lanthorn.
Man: You’re comparing a woman’s right to choose whether or not she wants to carry a potential child to term (and dramatically change her life, cause unforeseen health issues, potentially lead to a bad life for a child, etc) to an event which imprisoned/killed millions of [already born] people and caused the death of countless other via a global war?
CBR Response: We are comparing killing human beings who are little with killing human beings for any number of other arbitrary reasons.
We are comparing the dehumanization of unwanted preborn children with the dehumanization of other people groups singled out for destruction. For example, you claim that the preborn child is only a “potential” child, because you want to kill him or her. Similarly, Nazis said that their intended victims were “untermensch” (subhuman). Where does that end? Why not kill infants because they are only “potential” teenagers?
If you think somebody is going to have a bad life, you can kill that person? Where does that stop? We all know many people who came from difficult life circumstances; do you think they should be dead? How can the potential for future difficult life circumstances be used to justify killing anybody?
You mentioned the process of birth? How does that change anything about that baby? What is essentially different about a baby 10 minutes before birth and that same baby 10 minutes after? Why do you believe it is OK to decapitate and dismember the one and not the other?
Tags: CBR, Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Genocide Awareness Project, Grand Valley State University, Lanthorn
This entry was posted on Monday, May 16th, 2016 at 2:30 pm and is filed under Pro Life, Pro Life Apologetics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.