Posts Tagged ‘abortion pictures’
Student reactions to Pro Life on Campus at University of West Florida
On February 14-15, CBR took the Genocide Awareness Project (GAP) to the University of West Florida. The video below features students talking about the project.
Media coverage was extensive:
Abortion – One man’s pain
We are indebted to CBR’s Seth Drayer for sharing this encounter with a student at Florida State University.
“She called me up and told me she was pregnant, that she was going to keep the baby. Two weeks later, she called and told me she’d gotten rid of it.”
I looked at the young man standing before me. “How do you feel?” I asked.
“Oh, man . . . I don’t want anyone to feel what I feel.”
Moments before, I had withdrawn from GAP to catch my breath. The verbally violent protestors, the student playing the accordion loudly in front of me to stifle conversation: all of it was choking my love for the students at Florida State University.
After reflection and prayer, I returned to the display. And then I met Chris.
“Do you have pictures of an 18 week-old?” he asked.
Immediately, I knew why he was asking. “Yeah, follow me.” I led him to our prenatal development sign and pointed to the 18 week image: a close up of the baby’s face. “Is that how old your baby was?” I asked cautiously.
Chris nodded. His eyes began to water. “It’s not right,” he said. “I’m the kind of guy who always protects. And here, the one person I was supposed to . . .”
And then he asked me a question I did not want to answer: “Did he feel it?”
I wanted to tell Chris that the baby felt no pain during the abortion, to mask the barbarity of it and lessen Chris’s own suffering. But, he needed the truth. When I shared it with him, he could only shake his head in defeat.
Then, I told him that I know what it feels like to be a father stripped of his duty. I shared with him the empty powerlessness I had felt when Aubrie and I lost our own child by miscarriage. Fathers are meant to protect their children—yet neither Chris nor I had been able to do so.
“Remember this, Chris,” I told him, “you are and always will be a father.”
Chris returned the next day. His countenance had changed completely. He told me he had accepted the reality of his pain. He had brought a friend to show him the picture of “his” 18 week baby. He was even smiling.
Chris had needed someone to validate his pain. I had needed someone to remind me why I was there. I praise God for allowing us to meet.
Pro Life on Campus at Florida State University
CBR’s Florida GAP tour continues. Wednesday and Thursday, GAP made it’s 3rd appearance at Florida State University.
Media: FSU Student Newspaper
Pro Life on Campus at University of West Florida
Monday and Tuesday of this week, we had our Genocide Awareness Project (GAP) at the University of West Florida. This is part of a tour of 4 Florida universities being sponsored by CBR Southeast, CBR Midwest, and CBR Florida.
Media:
Pro Life on Campus – New video debuts tonight!
CBR is following the model of social reform demonstrated by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Lewis Hine, the American abolitionists of the 1800s, and William Wilberforce and Thomas Clarkson, who helped end the slave trade in England.
Dr. King found ways to show people what racism really looked like. Pictures of racist attacks on TV and in magazines opened people’s eyes and helped end segregation in less than 10 years.
CBR uses this same model of social reform to open people’s eyes to the truth about abortion.
Here is the video we’ll be showing tonight at our Celebrating Life event.
Pro-Life Training Academy at U of West Florida
I’m in Pensacola today, along with Seth Drayer and Mark Harrington, training students how to defend the pro-life position on campus. This training is part of a 2-week tour of Florida being conducted by CBR. We’ll be visiting 4 major universities across the state with our Genocide Awareness Project (GAP).
We have a full house for this training. Among those in attendance include members of the Pensacola Teens for Life, Spring Hill College (Mobile) Students for Life, and a team of Canadian students who are in Florida to learn how to conduct our world-famous GAP outreach. (Either that or they’re trying to escape the snow.)
We are making tentative plans to conduct this training and take GAP to Kentucky early in April.
CBR featured in Knoxville News Sentinel: Graphic imagery shows truth about abortion
Great column in the Knoxville News Sentinel this morning by columnist Greg Johnson. Be sure to add your comments at the bottom of the column.
By the way, here’s your last chance to order tickets to Celebrate Life with Mike Huckabee on Monday night.
BBC: Pictures make the biggest difference.
This BBC report on the battle over abortion in Northern Ireland features pro-life activist Bernadette Smyth.
From the BBC report:
What makes the biggest difference to Bernie Smyth’s campaign is what turned her into a pro-life campaigner in the first place: pictures like these.
http://www.belowtheradar.tv/abortionwars.html
.
Do abortion pictures work?
People always want to know if the pictures work. Here’s a message left on our AbortionNo.org website:
Yesterday I went to the March for Life 2011 in Washington DC. I live about 20 minutes outside of DC. I went with my high school. People told us we were crazy to go out for 5 hours in 20 degree weather, but I told them I wouldn’t miss it. At the March, I saw the abortionNO.com billboards and had to stop and look. My friends and I were aghast. … [Later, at home that night,] I remembered the posters from this website. I decided to take a look. That was about 2 and half hours ago. I looked at the pictures and watched the videos and read the mothers’ accounts of regret after the abortion. I am crying. In the past couple hours, I also started researching about President Obama’s views on abortion, about Planned Parenthood, and about the actual process of abortion. I have been reading many abortion articles by Michelle Malkin, and I just learned about the Philadelphia Horror. I JUST HEARD ABOUT IT. Something that awful and horrific, how could that not be top story on the news??? Reality TV stars get more airtime on the news than actual murder of babies. I am crying right now, at the injustice of it all! I watched the news last night to see if there would be coverage of the March. It got a one minute spot 40 minutes after the program started, after local news, some report about a reality TV star, and 2 weather reports. Where are our PRIORITIES??
I have spent a good deal of time on this website, at least 2 and half hours. I am reading all of the reports and looking at all of the pictures because right after I send this, I am writing a letter to my Congressman. I have never felt more inspired to take action after looking at this website.
I have always been ProLife, having been raised in a strong Catholic family, and having received a Catholic education. But ever since I began reading all this information and seeing all the pictures online today, I have never truly understood the injustice. I promise not to just be a prolife supporter now, I promise to be a prolife advocate. I will be a voice to those who cannot be heard. I may only be 15, but I will not stand for the absolute crap that is going on here. Thank you, THANK YOU, for opening my eyes to the reality of how bad abortion was.
CBR burning up Jill Stanek blog.
JillStanek.com is a pro-life blog that is read world-wide. Readers are burning up the comment lines on two recent postings featuring CBR:
- My post, Use of graphic pictures not optional. This post generated more than 100 comments. Please go add your own! This post was a good lead-in to this next one …
- Jill’s post, Video: The most shocking 4-minute abortion debate you will ever see. A new CBR video juxtaposes shocking, graphic abortion footage upon a soothing videothat was produced by the Northland Family Planning Centers, a chain of late-term abortion clinics in Michigan. The Northland video describes abortion as an act of “courage.” The CBR overlay displays the truth. (Note: the link given here just goes to Jill’s posting, not the video itself.)
Note to a pro-life pastor
My response to a pastor who commented on a previous post.
Dear Pastor,
On my blog, you asked if you could use my argument as part of your public requests (pulpit and bulletin announcements) for increased participation in prayer vigils and other peaceful, legal efforts to close the Planned Parenthood facilities in Midland and Odessa, TX.
Yes. Please. Thank you so much. Please encourage your church members (and your church body) to become involved in activities like this. Please use anything I have written. I put these ideas out there for folks like you to use.
As you are planning your presentation, please bear in mind that most Christians who are doing nothing to stop the killing don’t even know what abortion is. They think they do but they don’t. They are trying to ignore or trivialize abortion, because that allows them to do nothing about it. That’s why you must use abortion images to show them what it is. If they don’t see it, they won’t understand it and won’t do anything about it.
Some will complain about this and assert that you only need to show pretty pictures of preborn children. If that were true, a photo of a Jewish family picnic on the Rhine would be adequate to convey the horror of the death camps. I’m sorry, but I look at a nice Jewish family photo, and it tells me nothing about Auschwitz.
If we are going to ever stop the killing, we must correct three adverse conditions:
- Christians need to know the truth of it. They don’t. (That’s why the abortion rate even inside the “pro-life” church is so high.)
- Christians need to care enough to do something about it. They don’t.
- The Church must lead. It doesn’t.
It is my belief that correcting #1 is critical to correcting the other two. Let me emphasize this point: To understand it, your church needs to see it!
Dr. Martin Luther King said, “America will never stop racism until America sees racism.” That’s why he organized marches, knowing that the peaceful marchers would be attacked with dogs and water cannons. It was pictures of these attacks, on TV and in magazines, that changed America. I can tell you that America will not stop abortion until America sees abortion, and there is no place more fitting than our churches to begin this educational process. Babies will die in your church if you don’t show pictures.
When guiding your members how to act in holding back the children on the way to slaughter (Proverbs 24:11-12), encourage them to use graphic abortion images in their work. It’s not important that all use graphic images; but it is important that those who oppose their use are not allowed to dissuade others who might be agreeable.
If you need ideas how to counter objections or have any other questions, feel free to contact me.
You might want to check out the slides from my talk this weekend to the Students for Life of America conference in DC.
We’d be glad to provide a speaker for your church anytime.
Thanks,
Fletcher
GAP at the 2011 March for Life
CBR’s Genocide Awareness Project (GAP) was on display again this year at the National March for Life.
It is one of our most important deployments of the year, because so many of the marchers are young people who really have no idea what an abortion is … until we show them! Many high-school students have commented that our display, which they only see for a minute or so, is the most memorable and impacting experience of their entire trip. They will remember the pictures of abortion long after every one of the speeches have been forgotten.
Debate over graphic images.
I was pleased to a speaker at the Students for Life of America (SFLA) conference in DC yesterday. There were four of us on a panel discussing the use of graphic images. I spoke first and used some of that time to talk about the history of social reform. Successful reformers have always used pictures to help people see (1) the humanity of the victims and (2) the horror if the injustice they sought to correct. Here are my slides.
Two of the speakers who followed me raised objections that easily could have been rebutted, but I was given no opportunity to do so. I had actually anticipated their objections and addressed them fair adequately in my opening statement, but I still wanted to reemphasize some of the main points in the face of factual inaccuracies and logical fallacies advanced by my debate partners. Some of their objections:
- Because some people who use pictures are not compassionate to women, then showing pictures is not compassionate — An obvious logical fallacy. Further, Dr. Alveda King, who has had 2 abortions, said she is glad photos are being shown so that other women won’t have to experience the pain that she has endured.
- Pictures hurt children because it upsets them — Violent photos are routinely seen on magazine covers that children see at the supermarket. Schindler’s List was shown on NBC and PBS during prime family viewing hours; few people complained. An emergency siren will terrify young children, but we still put sirens on fire trucks.
- Some people see the pictures and think we might be violent — Racists and civil rights moderates tried to associate Dr. King with the violent tactics of the Black Panthers. CBR condemns violence and will not associate with anybody who fails to condemn violence.
- Other methods can save babies — True, but many women have reported that they didn’t have abortions because of abortion photos and that nothing else but those pictures had dissuaded them. Also, our goal shouldn’t be just to save a few, but to get rid of the whole bloody mess.
- GAP was a failure because some people objected to the genocide comparisons and used it to change the subject — Pro-aborts always try to change the subject, no matter what you do.
- GAP was a failure because a lot of people didn’t stop to talk and therefore didn’t learn facts —The pictures convey at a glance the facts that matter most: the preborn child is a baby and abortion is an act of violence.
- Most people like arguments more than pictures — Most people don’t care about philosophy, arguments, etc.. They are trying very hard to ignore or trivialize abortions, and pictures don’t let them do it. We have show pictures and be prepared to debate.
- There was more but I can’t remember.
I hope we get to do this again. I am going to ask for more opportunity to rebut arguments.
Pro-aborts: “CBR so effective, only censorship and bully tactics can defeat them.”
We have many endorsements from college students, pro-life activists, political leaders, and others who have seen our work in action. But this piece amounts to the strongest endorsement we have ever gotten.
Freedom of (hate) speech: Confronting the rise of anti-choice activities on Canadian campuses was written by a pro-abortion activist in Canada who laments the effectiveness of our Canadian CBR affiliate. She is so frustrated by the effectiveness of our work, she believes only censorship and bully tactics can ensure our defeat.
The more sophisticated of our opponents know that any open admission of our effectiveness will only make our fundraising and recruiting efforts more effective. That is what makes the candor in this article so remarkable. Military intelligence officials who interrogate prisoners of war usually focus their questions on determining what their captors believe to be the most effective tactics being employed against them and why. Our abortion adversaries just volunteered that information and we didn’t even need to water-board them!
Some excerpts:
These on-campus battles are the new front line of pro-choice activism in Canada. But with anti-choicers setting the terms of debate, how can pro-choice activists respond? [Note their admission that CBR is setting the terms of the debate, which is exactly what we want to do.]
But one thing that they have been really effective at doing is coming up with messaging that affects the popular discourse, which I think is a really dangerous thing because it will eventually seep into the legislature and the courts. [Another admission that CBR is “really effective.” Note the recognition that our work on campus will transform culture.]
Anti-choice groups are using the free speech argument to win the public relations battle … [The author believes we are winning. That’s important, because winning is how the killing stops.]
These presentations and displays have provoked a pro-choice response in a way the activities of other anti-choice groups have not. [That’s because the activities of other pro-life groups, in the view of the author, are not effective and need not be countered.]
With anti-choicers setting the terms of debate, pro-choice advocates have had to grapple with the utility of confronting these groups head-on … [To this author, “confronting these groups head-on” means shouting us down and running us off the stage.]
A new generation of anti-choice groups is establishing a reputation for itself on Canadian campuses, with increasingly visible tactics that many pro-choice activists call discriminatory, harassing and hateful. [Note the significance of “harassing” and “hateful” labels, which could allow pro-life speech to be censored under Canadian law.]
The university administration is barraged with phone calls and emails calling for the event to be shut down on the grounds that it amounts to harassment and is offensive to women … Shortly after the event begins, a group of about 10 women and their allies enter the room, chanting and blocking the projector with the intent of disrupting the presentation. [The context of this passage is an explicit endorsement of censorship and bully tactics.]
… the CCBR legally constitute hate speech by inciting hatred towards those women who have or support the right to have abortions, and should thus be restricted in order to prevent the harassment of women. [Note the call for censorship.]
Unfortunately, it seems that the freedom of expression of protesters is not taken as seriously at McGill as hateful speech … [Note the dismay over lack of censorship.]
Do pictures work? Meet Abby Johnson! Today only, get her new book at 35% off!
She was the director of the Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Bryan, Texas. But she had never seen abortion until one fateful day in September 2009. Her clinic was shorthanded and needed somebody to man the ultrasound machnine. She was asked to lend a hand.
In her new book, unPlanned, available today only at a 35% discount, Abby Johnson tells us what changed her from pro-choice to pro-life:
I could not imagine how the next 10 minutes [i.e., seeing abortion] would shake the foundation of my values and change the course of my life. (page 2)
The image of the tiny body, mangled and sucked away, was replaying in my mind … (page 5)
If she worked at an abortion clinic–even serving as its director–and was ignorant about what abortion is and does, how much more ignorant must our teenagers be, unless we show them the truth?
At a webcast I attended last night, I heard Ms. Johnson describe the process of changing her mind. As we have observed in others, she required a “sink-in” period. Even after she saw abortion, she didn’t become pro-life immediately. She started out by saying, “I’m still pro-choice, but abortion is wrong for me.” A few days later, it was, “I’m still pro-choice, but maybe abortion shouldn’t be legal in all cases. Eventually she realized, “Maybe I’m pro-life.” It’s a process.
Let me encourage you to purchase her book today. It’s important because the first-day sales can determine whether the book shows up on the best-seller list or not, and also whether it is displayed at the front of the bookstore or at the back. The more sales it gets on this first day, the more attention it gets, the more publicity it gets, etc. All the juice means more people buy the book and learn the truth about Planned Parenthood. Get your 35% discount here.